Editorial Policy

Editorial Independence Is Not a Policy. It Is a Foundational Requirement.

Every piece of intelligence published by CyberTech Intelligence – whether a research report, threat analysis, newsletter briefing, expert interview, or market study – is produced under the same editorial standard: independence from commercial influence, commitment to accuracy, and transparency in sourcing and methodology.

This page describes the principles and practices that govern how CyberTech Intelligence research is commissioned, produced, reviewed, and published.

Editorial Independence

CyberTech Intelligence maintains full editorial independence from all vendor relationships, advertising arrangements, and commercial partnerships.

Coverage decisions – which topics we research, which threat actors we analyze, which market developments we examine – are made exclusively by our editorial and research team based on strategic relevance and intelligence value to our audience. Commercial relationships do not influence topic selection, analytical conclusions, or the framing of research findings.

When we accept sponsorship or advertising from cybersecurity vendors, those arrangements are disclosed and do not extend to editorial coverage. Vendors cannot purchase positive coverage, influence research conclusions, or direct analytical framing.

Research Methodology and Sourcing Standards

All CyberTech Intelligence research publications are developed in accordance with the following methodology standards:

• Primary Source Preference – We prioritize primary source material: original threat intelligence, direct enterprise research, practitioner interviews, official government and regulatory documents, and verified incident data
• Source Attribution – Sources are cited within research publications. Where attribution is not possible due to sensitivity or confidentiality, methodological constraints are disclosed
• Uncertainty Acknowledgment – When analytical conclusions are interpretive or based on incomplete data, we clearly distinguish analysis from verified fact
• Peer Review – Research reports and major analytical publications are reviewed internally for methodological consistency, factual accuracy, and analytical soundness before publication
• Update and Correction Policy – Research that is found to contain errors is corrected promptly, with a correction notice published alongside the updated content

Expert Contributors and Conflict of Interest

CyberTech Intelligence publishes contributions from external cybersecurity practitioners, CISOs, researchers, and industry experts. All contributors are required to:

• Disclose any commercial relationships, vendor affiliations, or financial interests relevant to their contribution
• Confirm that their contribution reflects their independent professional perspective and is not produced at the direction of a vendor or commercial sponsor
• Accept that their contribution may be edited for clarity, accuracy, and adherence to our editorial standards

Contributors retain the ability to review edits for factual accuracy prior to publication. Editorial control over framing, headlines, and conclusions rests with the CyberTech Intelligence editorial team.